Scotland

You're not signed in
Sign in
Sign up
The Greatest Scot

Robert the Bruce 1274-1329

King of Scots who secured Scotland’s independence from England.

27 August 2009 15:38 GMT

118991
Video will appear here shortly.

Robert was born on 11 July 1274 into an aristocratic Scottish family. Through his father he was distantly related to the Scottish royal family; his mother had Gaelic antecedents.

Extracts from the accompanying The Greatest Scot television programme are being added to these biographical notes as the programme is broadcast between November 9 and 13, 2009. If you live outside the UK, you will not be able to see these, but you may enjoy other videos about some of the subjects which are available via links in the text. Here is an interview with the Earl of Elgin, today's Chief of the Name of Bruce and a news report from the ticket office at the tiny Renton railway station, which has recently been transformed into a mini-Sistine Chapel in tribute to Scotland's greatest king.

Bruce's route to the Scottish throne was complicated. His grandfather was one of the claimants to  during a succession dispute in 1290 - 1292. The English king, Edward I, was asked to arbitrate and chose John Balliol. But Bruce and his father (and many others) refused to back Balliol and supported Edward I's invasion of Scotland in 1296 to force Balliol to abdicate. Edward then ruled Scotland as a province of England.

Robert the Bruce 1274-1329

Bruce then supported William Wallace's uprising against the English. After Wallace was defeated, Bruce's lands were not confiscated and in 1298, he became a guardian of Scotland, with John Comyn, Balliol's nephew and Bruce's greatest rival for the Scottish throne. In 1306, Bruce quarrelled with Comyn and stabbed him in a church in Dumfries. He was outlawed by Edward and excommunicated by the Pope for committing murder on holy ground. But Bruce retaliated by proclaiming his right to the throne and on 27 March, he was crowned king at Scone. The following year, Bruce was deposed by Edward's army and forced to flee. His wife and daughters were imprisoned and three of his brothers executed. Robert spent the winter on the island off the coast of Antrim (Northern Ireland) where he may or may not have seen a spider.

Returning to Scotland, Robert waged a highly successful guerrilla war against the English. At the Battle of Bannockburn in June 1314, he defeated a much larger English army under Edward II, confirming the re-establishment of an independent Scottish monarchy. Even after Bannockburn and the Scottish capture of Berwick in 1318, Edward II refused to give up his claim to the overlordship of Scotland. In 1320, the Scottish earls, barons and the 'community of the realm' sent a letter to Pope John XXII declaring that Robert was their rightful monarch. This was the famous Declaration of Arbroath and it asserted the antiquity of the Scottish people and their monarchy.

Four years later, Robert received papal recognition as king of an independent Scotland. In 1327, the English deposed Edward II in favour of his son and peace was made with Scotland. This included a total renunciation of all English claims to superiority over Scotland. Robert died on 7 June 1329. He was buried at Dunfermline. He requested that his heart be taken to the Holy Land, but it only got as far as Spain. It was returned to Scotland and buried in Melrose Abbey.

Ads by Google

Share

There are 20 comments

You need to be logged in to comment.

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

  1. Default avatar

    1. 16 Oct 2009 13:04Thormod said

    Without doubt an outstanding king and soldier, an inspiration to all. Considered the foremost knight in Europe at the time, even by the enemy. He renewed a downtrodden country's independence and it's people their worth. A true hero.

    Report as unsuitable

  2. Default avatar

    2. 31 Oct 2009 20:08Spirit of Wallace said

    A mercenary who fought for the highest bidder which was usually Longshanks and the English cause when rewards of lands and titles were on offer.

    Redeemed himself at Bannockburn but would never eclipse The Wallace as a true son of Scotland who fought alongside the common man for no reward and who was murdered by Bruce's former paymasters.

    Bruce therefore can never be considered as our Greatest Scot for the reasons stated above

    Report as unsuitable

  3. Default avatar

    3. 07 Nov 2009 01:05B.R. said

    Robert the Bruce gets my vote & should get every other Scot's, if their minds haven't been tainted by Braveheart's romantic fallacies! Of Sir William Wallace (a knight not a common man) what historical evidence exists to say he was the greatest man ever to walk on Scots soil? Wallace's story was penned by a man named Blind Harry almost 200 years after his death. You have to take excerpts from the history of others to piece together a jigsaw of Wallace & even at best it's sketchy. It makes for a good film tho, but Hollywood's never been big on the truth to churn out a good film. They used Scotland's greatest king to draw an emotive response from the public when the truth would've done. Braveheart's makers made little mention of SIR William but rather portrayed him as a common man betrayed by his noble betters & who better to use to distinguish the common man from the noble than Robert the Bruce! And what better plot than to play the role of Judas. Yet nothing could be farther from the truth. Sir John Stewart of Mentieth was the man who betrayed Wallace not Robert Bruce. Longshanks was a regular at the King of Scotland's table (Alexander III) Alexander married Longshanks' sister. The royal houses of Sco & Eng and much of the island's nobility regularly dined together, hunted & jousted, so when the Bruce family sided with the Plantagenets against the Balliols this was noble against noble, not nation against nation! It came to that of course when Longshanks started taxing us & attempting to use us in his wars like the Welsh but let's not get the truth mixed up with a load of class war cr-p invented to sell a book. Without Robert the Bruce there'd be no Scotland hence there'd be no U.K. ~Robert the Bruce~ .11 July 1274 - 7 June 1329. Rest in peace Braveheart. (If there was an honour for being Scotland's greatest martyr then THAT should go to William Wallace & no other!)

    Report as unsuitable

  4. Default avatar

    4. 07 Nov 2009 02:26john.m63 said

    For me the Greatest Scot has to be Robert The Bruce for without him Scotland would have ceased to exist way back in the 14th Century. Of course this means everything since him would've been British & not Scottish.

    Report as unsuitable

  5. Default avatar

    5. 07 Nov 2009 20:53B.R. said

    Totally agree with you John. We'd have ceased to be a country in our own right with every Scot dictated to by London & every penny squeezed out of us to shore up London's coffers, can any of today's Scots imagine that! Oops this is what's happening and has been since the outset of this political colonisation dressed up as a union: est' 1707. And who's responsible for the continuation of this? YOU & I. We do it every 4-5 yrs with a vote for one of the unionist parties, with the SAME insane, excuse: "Ach, they're the best ay a bad lot." Well if all the unionist parties are "a bad lot" then stop handing them the power to make an a-se of us every 4 yrs! You also said John: without the Bruce everything would've stopped being known as Scots & would've been known as British from then on in. I was tempted to split hairs by suggesting it may've been known as English instead but I came to my senses in time to realise that English & British are basically both one & the same thing. So aye yir right again there John. As we know, Britannia was the Roman name for the land south of Hadrian's Wall (mostly Eng), with all the land to the north (Sco) known as Caledonia. Britain of course only became known as Great Britain after the political colonisation of Scotland in 1707. Greater in size not majesty. So do bare in mind all you 'Scottish' UK citizens that the next time you refer to yourselves as British you'd be better off calling yourself a conquered Scot! U.K. Citizen or Scottish NOT British! Do you think our English neighbours would put up with Gordon Brown changing the name of the country to the U.K. of Gt Caledonia! (I can just hear them) "How dare they label us Scots!" Just shows how unracist we really are, even after all the casualties we suffered repelling the Nazi menace of WW2 we held our weesht while Winston Churchill P.M. of the U.K. signed his acknowledgement of Germany's surrender as the Prime Minister of England!

    Report as unsuitable

  6. Default avatar

    6. 08 Nov 2009 16:50Keith2009 said

    Please B.R dont use this as your stage for an Indpendence debate its not worth it, We all know the true facts why scotland is in the United Kingdom.

    Report as unsuitable

  7. Default avatar

    7. 09 Nov 2009 00:09Spirit of Wallace said

    BR please read my post again. Your knowledge of Scot's history is admirable but unfortunately tainted.

    "a knight not a common man" - Wallace was not knighted till after stirling bridge in order that he could be made guardian of scotland

    "Sir John Stewart of Mentieth was the man who betrayed Wallace not Robert Bruce" - Agreed but where in my post did I say that Bruce murdered Wallace?

    "Braveheart's makers made little mention of SIR William but rather portrayed him as a common man betrayed by his noble betters" - By your own admission this is fact. Stewart of Mentieth was a scots noble who betayed Wallace and was rewarded by Longshanks with Dunbarton Castle for his nights work - There's your Judas!

    Wallace died a horrible barbaric and slow death for his beliefs which never faltered throughout his short lifetime unlike the Bruce who i'm afraid, stood back and watched Longshanks attempt to destroy Scotland and make her a satallite state of England. He only threw his cards in with his countrymen after he murdered his closest rival for the crown of Scotland which forced his hand. After that there was no going back. He had to challenge the plantagenets for the right to rule an independant Scotland

    Doesn't sound like the greatest scot to me

    Report as unsuitable

  8. Default avatar

    8. 09 Nov 2009 18:43daz12 said

    robert the bruce gets my vote he was great leader for scotland i think he did fight with the english at some point but only 2 keep lands and stuff like that i would have done the same lol but i wont vote for wallace he was a great man to but he only won one major battle stirling bridge but not on his own with andrew murrey and if he never died shortly after the battle would he be as well known as wallace is today? plus wallace is only so well known because of blind harry and after wallace next major battle at falkirk he did go into exile and not much more is heard from him on the fighting front but he did kickstart the wars of independance and the battle at stirling bridge is a great achivement for wallace and murrey and wallace did take sum good english garrisons to but bruce is better cause he came back form defeat and and exile and build up an army that would demolish the english. but it would be good if sir james the good sir douglas or black douglas as he is also know was in the greatest scot he fought with bruce and was his right hand man almost he carryed his heart on crusade he has a great story recommend u read it i think hes is a greater leader than wallace he nearly killed the english king more than once and was a master at guerrila war fair

    Report as unsuitable

  9. Default avatar

    9. 09 Nov 2009 23:02chris rae said

    wallace is the man the true greatest scot because of what the english did to him our blood boiled thats why we fought so hard and overcame the english at banockburn from glen to glen village to village the name of the mighty wallace and his freedom cry will always remain

    Report as unsuitable

  10. Default avatar

    10. 10 Nov 2009 23:35B.R. said

    #6 Keith2009: "Please B.R. don't use this as your stage as an Independence debate it's not worth it, We all know the true facts why Scotland is in the United Kingdom." Actually Keith we don't ALL "know the true facts why Scotland is in the United Kingdom". You're asking me not to touch on the subject of independence whilst being asked my opinion on the greatest king we ever had due to the unbelievable amount of negative situations he turned into positives after taking the poisoned chalice which was the crown of Scotland, the foremost of these positives he acheived being the regaining of our INDEPENDENCE! I didn't really want to talk about independence as it tends tae get a bit tedious running over the same old ground. However I'll invite you to say your piece on your understanding as to how we became fully entrenched in the U.K. Not the union of the crowns in 1603 but the final nail in the coffin so to speak, 1st May 1707 as the Earl Seafield signed Scotland's independence over to Westmidden remarking: "Well there's an end tae ane auld sang" while the bells of St.Giles rang out the tune "Why am I so sad on this my wedding day". Well I'll leave you some space to impart some of your understanding as to what made Scotland's nobles sign away our country's freedom, as I said we actually don't ALL know the true facts of why our country came to be politically colonised under the guise of a "union", so the stage is all yours Keith.

    Report as unsuitable

  11. Default avatar

    11. 11 Nov 2009 01:48B.R. said

    #7. Spirit of Wallace. My friend I have the utmost respect for William Wallace! I hope you weren't left with the notion that I was being disrespectful towards him, for as sketchy as the history is on him, I still feel in my gut that he was a great Scot & in my own opinion Scotland's greatest ever martyr! I may be wrong, but that's my thoughts. Re: Stewart of Menteith being the rat that betrayed Wallace & NOT Bruce; I didn't say this for your own retention but for those that've picked up that wee bit of 'tainted' Scots history from Hollywood. And I also highlighted the case of him being a knight to shoot another hole in their romantic fallacies! Not to take any kudos from Wallace but more in ire at the disrespect shown to others that laid down their lives like Andrew de Moray who cleared the whole of Scotland of English north of the Forth before fighting & dying alongside Wallace at Stirling! He wasn't even mentioned! And The Bruce who probably knighted Wallace after Stirling! They made him out to be a traitor! That's ridiculous! Also with Wallace, he wasn't just an unknown lad of common lineage who was enthused by the deeds of de Moray in the north, mirrored him, joined forces at Stirling, survived the victory & was knighted for his efforts! Wallace's own father was a knight, the business of knighthoods etc ran in his family. But as I say mate the historical records are sparse, maybe at best the truth of it all lies somewhere between what you & I envisage? You also mentioned The Bruce killing Comyn "at the alter of a chapel" of all places, that's what Plantagenet told the Pope who duly excommunicated the whole country giving Longshanks Carte Blanche to do as he pleased with Scots & Scotland! Surely we can see through London's blatent politicking. Have you never heard of Kirkpartick who was at Bruce's side? The Kirkpatrick clan motto to this day is "I'll Mak Siccar", or in English: "I'll Make Sure".

    Report as unsuitable

  12. Default avatar

    12. 11 Nov 2009 13:14B.R. said

    #8 Daz12. re: Sir James Douglas: Totally agree with you Daz, the good Sir James is an excellent nomination for Greatest Scot! His story almost raises the hair on the back of your neck much like the Bruce's story. I can't understand why "The Black Douglas" isn't up there. On turning the last page of his story you get much the same feeling as you did when reading of The Bruce or Wallace, it commands your respect for the man and gives you a feeling that says: "I'm proud to be Scottish." Before The Bruce & The Black Douglas rose to prominence the English tramped in & out of Scotland and robbed, raped & more or less done what they pleased without having to worry about any sort of sustained comeback, but when the Bruce was king with Douglas at his side the English wouldn't come within a mile of the Scots border, even after we'd taken back Berwick by force in 1318. Their continued refusal to recognise Scotland as a sovereign independent nation led to the continued invasion & destruction of the whole of the northern half of England by hordes of Scots led by the Black Douglas, England's nobles & barons were so disgruntled with their king's refusal to recognise Scots sovereignty from his safe haven of his London hideout that they threatened to pledge allegiance for their lands to the king of Scotland, still he wouldn't acknowledge Scotland as an independent country so he was murdered by his own royal court to spare the English from taking any more hammerings by Bruce & Douglas. Robert the Bruce built up such a solid & fearsome empire in Scotland that the Scots were feared throughout the whole island. It's said that English parents would soothe their wee ones to sleep at night with the rhyme: "Hush ye hush ye, do not fret ye, for the Black Douglas will not get ye." If this man worshipped the Bruce as his king then what stature of man was The Bruce?

    Report as unsuitable

  13. Default avatar

    13. 12 Nov 2009 00:26john.m63 said

    B.R. I cannot agree with you more regarding "The Good Sir James". Probably the best, most noble and most loyal soldier this country has ever known. His story makes me so proud to be Scottish.

    Also agree with your statement "if this man worshipped the Bruce as his king then what stature of man was The Bruce?"

    To Spirit of Wallace I would say..."Cometh the hour, cometh the man". Yes Bruce wavered. Yes he had doubts and after Methven (spelling) HUGE doubts.Who wouldn't. You're talking about taking on the greatest army in Christendom! But the point is he WAS willing to give up a cozy seat at Edward's side to become King of Scots and to risk everything in the process. After all, all of Bruce's brothers were killed in the same manner as Wallace.

    With regards to Wallace's betrayal: you must understand the political system of the time. The ONLY people who had the right to raise an army were the nobles (the landed gentry). The fact that Wallace, a commoner, was able to raise an army made him a threat to the political establishment (English & Scottish). A medieval revolutionary if you like. This is one of the reasons Edward I hated him (& feared him) so much. The fact of the matter is that, because of the threat he posed to the political establishment, he had to go. I believe this is why he was betrayed.

    The fact remains that, regardless of his personal motives, Robert The Bruce is the Greatest Scot & we all owe our existence to his bravery, leadership abilities and martial skills.

    Report as unsuitable

  14. Default avatar

    14. 12 Nov 2009 01:06daz12 said

    yes br i agree he should be in the greatest scots its just james the good sir is almost forgoten about. but when people read about him they all love his story he was a great man really clued up and was really famous in his day across europe when he went on crusade and met up with everyone in spain. everyone there came to see him even the english lol yes his story is a great one reccomend everyone 2 read it plus look up the bute mazer its a drinking cup from after bannocburn with bruce in the middle as a lion and the coat of arms of his closest support i have been lucky enough to see it in edinburgh

    Report as unsuitable

  15. Default avatar

    15. 12 Nov 2009 13:02Spirit of Wallace said

    So refreshing and uplifting to read through these posts - ah the spirit of Scotland lives on my friends and fellow countrymen.

    "Wha's like us, Damn few an' they're aw deid"

    Report as unsuitable

  16. Default avatar

    16. 13 Nov 2009 22:4600Kell said

    I think that the Scotland of 700 years ago was completely different to the Scotland of today. The beliefs, traditions, language and heritage of the people were completely different to those of modern Scots. Do not under estimate the significance of 700 years. In 700 years Robert the Bruce could have had over 8 million decendants.

    In only 200 years the Scots who have emigrated to Nova Scotia are no longer seen as being Scottish despite keeping their traditions. As there are more Gaelic speakers in Nova Scotia than in Scotland perhaps they have done a better job of keeping old Scottish values then we have.

    The point is: 700 years is too long a time to go back to find a great man that we can proudly call one of us.

    Report as unsuitable

  17. Default avatar

    17. 13 Nov 2009 23:18john.m63 said

    I take your point 00Kell but would argue that time does not diminish greatness. On the contrary, the fact that these men are still remembered with such great pride and affection after all this time is, in itself, testament to their greatness.

    However, I think we should also be extremely proud of the fact that down through the years there have been so many truly great Scotsmen to choose from. Wha's like us indeed?

    Report as unsuitable

  18. Default avatar

    18. 14 Nov 2009 00:18Spirit of Wallace said

    00Kell- I NOTE THAT YOU HAVE USED THE SAME POST WORD FOR WORD ON THE WALLACE PAGE.

    MAY I SUGGEST THAT YOU TAKE NOTE OF john.m63 whose comments utterly destroy your views and opinions.

    I also take note that you don't actually nomoinate who your greatest scot should be!

    NO DOUBT,HAD YOU BEEN AROUND 700 YEARS AGO YOU WOULD HAVE SAT ON THE FENCE AND LET YOUR NATION BE GROUND INTO PULP BY ANY USURPER WHE FANCIED HIS CHANCES

    Report as unsuitable

  19. Default avatar

    19. 14 Nov 2009 18:16 345 said

    A tough choice between William Wallace & Robert Bruce, both great men, but I'm going to go for William Wallace!

    He stood up for the people of Scotland and reminded them they are as worthy as our neighbours in England.

    With no wealth and against the law of the land he still stood up for Scotland!

    I think that due to Braveheart, despite the inaccuracies, it is Wa;;ace who has reminded us of our roots and our Scottish identity.

    I doubt Robert the Bruce could achieve this!

    Report as unsuitable

  20. Default avatar

    20. 15 Nov 2009 02:40john.m63 said

    You raise an interesting point 345 & it is something which has puzzled me all my life. As a Nation we seem to have so much difficulty celebrating success. Despite my protestations for the Bruce cause I am convinced that William Wallace will win this competition & be voted the Greatest Scot of all time. Although I admire the man greatly (& freely admit that if it wasn't for him Bruce & Douglas would never have been as successful as they became) I find this somewhat sad as it reflects the flaw in our Scottish mentality... Down through the years we have always had a propensity to celebrate heroic failure & have always had a massive problem with success. Wallace, Culloden, the football team, it goes on & on. Yes, Wallace gave us our sense of identity but it was Bruce, Douglas & Randolph who secured it. Despite this we seem to be Hell bent on celebrating the 'Loser' & that is what is wrong with this country.

    As I said in an earlier post we should be immensely proud of the number of truly Great Scotsmen there have been down through the years (just think of those who are missing from this vote, John Logie Baird, Sir Colin Campbell, John McAdam, John Boyd Dunlop... I could go on).All of them hugely successful in their field. And yes, Sir William Wallace deserves his place among them. But, until we can reconcile our National identity to associate and venerate our Victorious heroes then, much as it saddens me to say it, we will be condemned to being the minor player in this symbiotic relationship we call the United Kingdom. Instead of sitting in the driving seat where we belong...

    Report as unsuitable

You need to be logged in to comment.

sign in

Don't have a mySTV account? Create one now it's easy

Posts are not actively monitored by STV. The views expressed are those of our users and do not necessarily reflect the views of STV.